I did this mainly because of two reasons: Firstly, Jekyll ist just too slow (because Ruby is slow). The site generation takes forever, with tags and category generation it gets even worse. I had to limit the amount of generated pages to 5 during development, to have a nearly instant update of the stuff I write. And my blog has just around 80 articles. I’ve read stories of large sites, where the generation takes hours. Secondly I wanted to stop updating Node packages and Gems (one ecosystem is enough).
Researching the options
Before I decided for Hugo, I did a quite long research of the possible static site generators.
Another tool, which looked quite nice was Roots. But after some research I found out it’s already discontinued.
In the end the features of Hugo were just too good and after testing it for some days I decided to use it, despite having no clue of Go.
The first thing which is surprising: Hugo is a binary, which is cross platform and after installing it, that’s it. It’s as easy on a Mac as this:
$ brew install hugo
The main reason for switching was for me speed. And fast it is. Generating my whole site, with 86 articles, 125 tags, 21 categories and 2 series takes ~700 ms. This means everything included, even moving all the assets. If I wouldn’t use my Related Articles section, I could cut the time in half. Since I use Gulp and minimize, optimize and do a lot to my files, my production Gulp task needs now ~30 seconds (including syncing the files to the server), compared to 2-3 minutes before.
How fast Hugo really is can be best seen in this video: Hugo benchmark - 5,000 posts in seconds.
Hugo comes without a plugin system, but I didn’t miss any and could find a solution for everything I had on my Jekyll site before. The templates are written in Go html/template, Ace or Amber. The latter look very familiar to people, who know Jade/Pug. But I choose the Go html/template. The syntax needs some time to get used to, as it’s so different from all template engines I’ve used before. But if I got stuck with a problem the Hugo Discussion Board could help out in all cases. Hugo comes with specific rules for templates, how to name them and rules in which order templates get rendered.
It also has really nice Theme system, which allows to create very modular Themes. And because creating a theme is so easy there are a lot very good of them available.
Instead of plugins Hugo uses Shortcodes, which is very refreshing. Writing plugins in Jekyll was not fun. With Shortcodes it’s possible to create the same functionality without needing to know Ruby and the Liquid for Programmers guidelines and still getting the same result with less lines and writing mostly Markup.
Another really nice thing is the organization of the content. You can create multiple sections and or types of content, serving them at your chosen URL. And you can create pages or content just out of data (Jekyll has this, too).
Content is written in Markdown (or Asciidoc, reStructuredText) and can be extended with Frontmatter (in TOML, YAML or JSON).
Hugo comes with Menu generation and a Taxonomy system, which lets you create as many Taxonomies (tags, categories, etc.) as you like.
Converting my site from Jekyll to Hugo just took three days. My tendency of over-engineering and perfection allocated a lot of the time. And because of that, I started simplifying my CSS and Gulp tasks and will further simplify the site. But it was fun and if you need a static site you should have a look into Hugo.